How Can Policy Support Incomes and Fair Access to Work?
Inequality and poverty
What you will learn
- Universal payments, wage floors and anti-discrimination measures reach different groups.
- Apply the model to an original scenario and justify its limits.
Essential definitions
- Universal basic income
- A regular unconditional payment to individuals irrespective of employment or income.
- Minimum wage
- A legal floor on the wage employers may pay covered workers.
- Discrimination
- Unequal treatment based on characteristics unrelated to relevant productive ability.
Understand a universal payment
A universal basic income is a regular payment without a means test or work condition. Everyone covered receives it, reducing eligibility gaps and stigma. Taking a job does not remove the payment itself, although taxes used to finance it can still affect the net reward to work.
A meaningful payment to everyone has a large budget cost. If it replaces targeted disability or housing support, people with high needs may lose. Compare the final tax-and-benefit package rather than the payment alone, identifying both how it is funded and who is better or worse off.
Improve access to employment
Anti-discrimination laws can prohibit recruitment, pay or promotion decisions based on irrelevant personal characteristics. Transparent procedures, enforcement and accessible complaints make rights more effective. Removing barriers helps qualified people use their abilities and can reduce persistent earnings gaps.
A law alone cannot supply missing qualifications, transport or childcare. Complementary services may be needed for formal equality to become a practical opportunity. This connects income policy to the previous lesson's emphasis on removing the actual constraint facing a household.
Read the minimum-wage model
Put the real wage vertically and labour quantity horizontally. In a competitive market, demand and supply meet at equilibrium E. A binding wage floor above it raises pay for retained workers, but employers demand fewer workers than people offer. Read employment at the floor's intersection with labour demand; the gap to labour supplied is excess supply.
This prediction depends on the model, size of the increase, productivity and enforcement. With employer wage-setting power, a moderate minimum can raise wages without the same job loss. A wage floor directly helps covered workers; a universal payment also reaches people without jobs. Compare those differences and budget costs, while enforcement and services address barriers neither payment can remove alone.
Labour market and structural unemployment
DL: w = 20 − 0.1L; SL: w = 4 + 0.1L. Equilibrium: 80 thousand workers at a real wage of 12. At the binding wage 14, 40 thousand workers are willing to work but not demanded.
Labour demand reflects firms’ demand for workers; labour supply shows workers willing to work. At a binding real wage above equilibrium, workers supplied exceed workers demanded. Skills or location mismatches can also cause structural unemployment without a legal wage floor.
How to draw it and model assumptions
- Real wage vertically and quantity of labour horizontally.
- Label DL, SL, equilibrium wage and employment.
- For a binding wage, mark labour demanded and supplied and the gap between them.
Competitive single labour market, all other determinants fixed. The excess-supply model is one structural explanation, not a claim that all unemployment or every minimum wage has this effect.
Apply and evaluate
- A wage floor’s effects depend on labour-market structure and how far it exceeds the prevailing wage.
- A UBI must be evaluated with its financing and any benefits it replaces.
Common misconceptions
- Universal payments are not necessarily equal net gains after taxes and changes in other benefits.
Knowledge check
Why might a minimum wage fail to help a household in deepest poverty?
Real-world application
Poverty lines depend on a PPP vintage
5 June 2025: The World Bank’s June 2025 update set the international extreme-poverty line at $3.00 per person per day in 2021 PPP international dollars, replacing $2.15 in 2017 PPP dollars.
The change is not an ordinary market-exchange-rate conversion. PPP data and the national poverty lines underlying the benchmark changed. Comparing poverty counts across releases requires a consistent method; a statistical revision is not itself proof that living conditions suddenly worsened.
World Bank, June 2025 update to global poverty lines ↗Historical evidence checked 9 October 2026. The model interpretation is an original teaching application.
What to remember
Universal payments, wage floors and anti-discrimination measures reach different groups. Compare coverage, employment effects and financing before choosing a combination.
Completion is your own reflection on learning, not a test score. Syllabus references: 3.4.18, 3.4.19, 3.4.20.
Sources and applications
Lessons in this section
Guest progress is saved on this browser. Log in to save across devices; import is optional.